Andrew Coan and David S. Schwartz contend that “unfounded assumptions of Federalist objectivity and Anti-Federalist irrelevance” have warped scholars’ understanding of the constitutional ratification debates. Read more here.
Andrew Coan and David S. Schwartz contend that “unfounded assumptions of Federalist objectivity and Anti-Federalist irrelevance” have warped scholars’ understanding of the constitutional ratification debates. Read more here.